EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD
Kathleen Aris, CMP
SunGard Availability Services Inc.
BC/DR Profession Helping Itself
Theresa G. Crawford, CBCP
Elavon
By PETER LAZ, MBCP
Aprimary purpose of DRJ’s Editorial Advisory Board (EAB) is to assist in enhancing DRJ conferences and maga- zine. The board is staffed by 16 expe- rienced BC/DR professionals with an
excelsior mindset. It is also a group that changes,
by design. There are term limits and that means
people roll-off and new members are elected.
At our board meeting during Spring World
2011, three members completed their initial service to the EAB. Martin Myers, David Shimberg
and Sara Williams all completed two consecutive
terms. David and Sara contributed many valuable
ideas and countless hours of service; and we all
thank them very much (and also know they will
continue their support and involvement with EAB
committees).
However, I would like to take this opportunity to especially thank Martin Myers. Martin has
served as the EAB chairperson for the last two
years; as well as the first chairperson of the rules
and regulations committee. Martin is a superb
leader and anyone who has ever met him knows he
is a true “southern gentleman.” As David and Sara
will no doubt continue supporting DRJ EAB committee work; Martin will continue to be a driving
force with the rules and regulations committee. As
Martin’s chairperson successor, I know that Martin
is available to me for advice and guidance. Thank
you Martin, David and Sara.
As three EAB members completed their service, the board elected three new members. Cole
Emerson, Colleen Huber and Theresa Crawford
are beginning their terms and we look forward to
their expertise and passion to enhance DRJ conferences and magazine.
Our Profession Helping Itself
In my travels around the country, I have the
pleasure of seeing a broad perspective of our profession and would like to make two observations.
Just this week I attended a community-wide tabletop exercise at an ACP meeting. It was an excellent
exercise that challenged the participants through
several realistic issues they had little to no control
over, but definitely impact business.
One element of the scenario was weather-related
and the exercise facilitator reached out to a local
news station and involved the evening anchor and
chief meteorologist to present situation updates;
just as they would present them on-air. They did a
phenomenal job! The chapter even arranged for the
district’s US Congressman to participate.
Various types of local user groups are organizing community-wide tabletop exercises. BC/DR
planners are gaining valuable knowledge and partnerships (both with peers and public sector agencies) that will contribute to them enhancing their
entities’ BC/DR program, plans and capabilities.
Our profession is helping itself by sharing experiential insights and proven practices to help each
other get better at what we do – add value to our
organizations.
Another example of our profession helping
itself is the proliferation of formalized BC/DR
program frameworks. More and more companies
are developing greater structure to their programs;
which will strengthen and sustain the recovery
readiness of the entity and ultimately enhance the
customer experience. I will admit that there are
various degrees of robustness of programs in our
profession; but establishing baseline program elements is better than developing isolated plans and
capabilities in a vacuum. It has been proven that
policies, standards, governance and reporting processes reduce risk and add value to the business
when they become part of the companies’ DNA.
Years ago only the larger corporations invested
in programs. That trend is shifting. More and more
small-to-medium-sized businesses (SMBs) recognize the value a comprehensive program adds to
the business. Sure regulatory requirements, audit
issues and risk appetite are determinants of BC/DR
investments.
Whether you believe is it an appropriate decision factor or not, many companies do base at least
part of their decision on how much to invest in
BC/DR on “What is our competition doing? What
level of resilience/readiness do they have?” Our
profession is helping itself by enhancing BC/DR
programs - and not just updating recovery plans
once a year.
v
As a managing consultant in Forsythe’s business continuity practice,
Peter Laz, MBCP, helps customers design, implement and manage
risk management programs. He is responsible for executive oversight
of BC/DR engagements and development of best-practice methodologies. Peter is also the chairperson of the DRJ Editorial Advisor Board.
Cole H. Emerson, MBCP, CPP
Cole Emerson & Associates
Linda R. Garcia, ABCP
Sandia National Laboritories
Robert Giffin, CBCP, CISA
Avalution
Timothy P. Ging
IBM Business Continuity and
Resiliency Services
Colleen K. Huber, CBRM
Great Lakes Educational Loan
Services
Louise Lachapelle, M.Sc., CBCP
Desjardins Financial Group
J. Frank Lady III,
CBCP, CISSP, PMP, MA, MSt, MBA
Bank of America
Peter Laz, MBCP
Forsythe
Dr. Tom Phelan
American Public University’s
School of Public Safety and Health
James O. Price Jr., MBCP, ITIL
3J Contingency Planning Services
Ken Schroeder, CBCP
Southeast Corporate
Sue Simpson, CBCP
Contingency Planning Association of
the Carolinas
Michele Turner,
MBCP, FBCI, CISA, ITIL
Microsoft Corporation
David H. Ziev, MBCP, MBCI,ITIL
PPBI